Skip to main content

Sarah Jeong, Attention Whore

If you don't know, Sarah Jeong has been employed by the New York Times. Perhaps she's that talented, perhaps she's earned it, that could be entirely true. That isn't the issue. The issue is that she is racist, particularly against white people. If you subscribe to the "new" definition of racism, she meets it. She is clearly prejuidiced and has power in that she is employed in the media field.

Here are some of her tweets:
Image result for Sarah Jeong tweets
Image result for Sarah Jeong tweets

Why does it matter? What's the big deal?

She claims she is "counter trolling". I will give her there is a small percentage of white people that are hostile to other racists. They tend to be in the minority. They are also powerless in their lives but put them behind a keyboard, and they become GIANTS of power, trolling everything in site. It could be sexism, misogeny, racism, you name it, they'll troll. Believe it or not, I have no issues with this sort of behavior being responded to with exposing them and if it impacts their "real life" (ie job loss), I'm okay with that since life is hard enough without being trolled.

This is who is responsible for bringing you the news. This is who lets you know if you'll be safe in a city or an area in your town. Would she report on the knock out game? Nope, not a chance. She will however report on anything about the white race. She is probably good friends with Chyna Fox and Cynthia G, but that's a story for another day.

What can you do?

Let the New York Times know you don't appreciate their choice of staff. She is not ethical nor unbiased. In fact she is openly hostile to people who do not share her racial make up. If more people would speak up, public opinion would matter. Boycotts and demonstrations do not really work but the bottom line for any company can and does matter. If you subscribe, cancel it and tell them why. Don't visit their site (if you can't go cold turkey, you can read reviews and watch videos about it online without generating ad revenue for them directly).

You can let the New York Times know what you think by writing an op ed piece. Learn more here:
https://help.nytimes.com/hc/en-us/articles/115014925288-How-to-Submit-a-Letter-to-the-Editor

That's all for now, but more will be coming!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Tragic Death of Gabrielle Barrett

Gabrielle Barrett was a four and a half year old little girl who had only been living with her mother, Candice Diaz for three months when she died on New Year's Eve at the hands of her mother and her mother's boyfriend, Brad Fields. The child was covered in bruises and suffered burns allegedly because she ran her own bath. Prior to this time, she had spent her entire life with her Grandmother, Cynthia Diaz who failed her horrendously by leaving her in the care of her mother. The grandmother claimed the child had to live with her mother to attend pre-k schooling. This school attendance is not mandatory, but is optional. In most states you are not required to enroll your child in school until the age of six. The grandmother stated during the preliminary hearing she saw Gabby on Christmas and she appeared fine. Her hair and teeth were fine, though allegedly she had head lice (not life threatening and easily treated). She did everything but backflips to defend her daughter...

Seandell Jackson

Seandell Jackson was convicted of murdering Nathan Potter who was a student at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. He had attempted to rob him, however Nathan was not carrying any cash and was merely traveling from one location to another at the time of his death. There is nothing special about Seandell, other than he is the poster child for why prisons exist, and that he and his family are responsible for the choices he made that day. When he was sentenced for first-degree intentional homicide and attempted robbery, he was sentenced to life in prison with no chance of parole, he screamed obscenities, and had to be tackled and pepper sprayed. He was not alone in his outbursts, his family yelled out as well: " I hate you! I hate you all!", " I hate all of you!", " God's the judge" . Funny to bring God into things when your family member has committed which God forbids. Perhaps they were absent on the Sunday that was being taught. It's easy ...

Tabitha Buck

Tabitha Buck was convicted in the murder of Lauri Show along with Lisa Michelle Lambert. Clearly, time has been kind to neither woman. Inside sources tell us Tabitha is quiet, keeps to herself and avoids all unnecessary drama. When the Supreme Court ruled that life sentences without parole were unconstitutional when utilized against juveniles, Buck became eligible to be re-sentenced for her role in the murder. She had the decency to testify on the stand, stating: “Honestly, I have some mixed emotions about today’s proceedings,” she said. “I can’t imagine how Laurie’s family feels that this is even happening. I also can’t imagine how my family is feeling that this is even happening”. Time will tell if she is safe to live in society without causing futher harm to others. In her defense, she was new to the area, had no friends and was befriended by Lambert who has proven herself to be controlling, domineering, and rather mentally ill. If released, she would relocate to Oregon, wher...